So, these articles are presenting facts and data, correct? So, what would be different in your source? Please explain.

Excuse me, that's how low I set the bar to knowing what I'm talking about? Again, explain this. Like I said, your source should have the same facts and data as the sources that I have read, as evidence and data don't change. What am I missing?

We can have a different interpretation, but when it comes to evidence and data, that would mean one of us is wrong.

Logic??? You can't be serious. You see the evidence and data but conclude that police brutality doesn't disproportionately, I mean grossly disproportionately, affect Black people? I mean, you say it's not solely a Black problem. Fine. Who's stopping white people from protesting it? What exactly is your point? You argue that police forces aren't organizations that exist, now and then, to check Black people... Your interpretation is revisionist, and it's wrong. It's not your opinion. It's wrong.

You don't think, possibly, or logically, that white people are nothing more than casualties of police brutality. Because if it's okay to do it to us, it will also be done to them. They won't be spared.

Do you think police officers would be as brutal and violent as they are, if there weren't, and were never, Black people in this country???

No they wouldn't be.

Gaslighting--a specific type of manipulation where the manipulator is trying to get someone (or a group of people) to question their own reality, memory, or perceptions.

You are gaslighting, or you've read a lot of information that you don't understand.