You're playing semantics. The word "typically" does not negate the truth of the definition of racist provided in this article. In fact, leave it out. Per this article, I'm speaking of racism as a white supremacy problem. It's a global problem, not isolated to America. That means it's the same problem on every continent, including Africa, as I state specifically in my article. I cannot speak on your personal experiences. However, Sweden is a European, majority white country. Therefore, it is a white supremacist country. A quick google search shows me that racism and xenophobia are a problem in Sweden. So, yes, I'm sure it operates the same way it operates in the U.S., as it does in other European countries. As it does in South America, Asia, Africa, and Australia. Is that specific enough for you? It is not dependent on where you find yourself in the world when the topic is global racism i.e. global white supremacy. There is no part of the world that is untouched by it.

Your argument about your experiences in Sweden is contingent upon me believing there was no white supremacy in Sweden. I don't believe that. Whatever you experienced, between the differing ethnic groups in Sweden was prejudice, not racism. Per my article.

You bring up the Pygmies and the Bantus (which is hilarious by the way) but that's also prejudice. Not racism. It seems like you didn't understand the most basic argument I made in my article.